Have a wonderful Holiday Season!
Blogged with Flock
Moving Beyond Web 2.0 to what's coming next.
is the title of a great post on the Ask 37signals blog. It's great advice that I can fully subscribe to and recommend. Doesn't really have anything to do with technology but is valid in a general sense.
By the way, I did watch Steve Martin on Charlie Rose, one of my favorite TV shows for which I have a TiVo season pass. One of the best and most knowledgeable interviewer of all times.
is the title of a column by Guy Kawasaki in AlwaysOn. It covers a study on the effectiveness of different kinds of word of mouth. I tend to agree with the results and Guy's comments.
The most effective WOM is by family, friends and colleagues, followed by regular folk and then pundits or those "in the know". If this was not the case, we'd be right back in the days of old media with the control over, or filtering of the message by editors and professionals. Those days are fast fading away as social media asserts itself.
Blogged with Flock
found this about The website marketing mind map on Hotelmarketing.com It sums up web based marketing in a visual and effective way.
Here Comes Another Bubble - The Richter Scales
and who can express it more succinctly than the Brits: SatLav scheme takes the piss out of Westminster as reported here by Absolute Gadget.
And fear not Americans, as synchronicity would have it, a similar service is being announced in several North American cities today -- including Atlanta, Boston, Brooklyn, Chicago, Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Manhattan, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, Oakland, Portland, San Francisco, San Jose, Seattle, Toronto, and Washington D.C. The new service is called MizPee (www.mizpee .com) from Yojo Mobile (www.yojomobile.com).
Who will ever doubt again the utility of the web for all of us in one of life's most dire situations.....!
Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll buy a funny hat. Talk to a hungry man about fish, and you're a consultant.
Scott Adams, Dogbert; Dilbert cartoons
US cartoonist (1957 - )
Here's a more detailed description of what Twine is about and it seems to me an improvement over what we've seen so far in social networking tools.
Nova Spivack thinks it's high time we make computers smart enough to manage the ocean of scattered information our digital lives create.
At the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco on Friday, Spivack will officially take Radar Networks, the start-up he co-founded, out of stealth mode and show off Twine, a Web service for managing information, using your social network and the Semantic Web.
With Twine, people collect different pieces of information in a single place and let other people add to that collection. People can e-mail items into Twine, bookmark Web pages or upload documents. To add tags, people fill in a form.
The software is smart enough to create tags itself after mining through the content, which can be text, audio or video. It also taps into the collective knowledge of Wikipedia to categorize information.
"This is the user experience side of the Semantic Web," said Spivack. "Our motto is 'people are lazy.' Who wants to spend their time being a librarian?...That's what we made computers for."
The idea behind the Semantic Web is that Web content has embedded data that allows applications to "talk" to each other. With that self-describing information, summed up in the RDF (Resource Description Framework) format, software agents can act on information, making life easier for Web users.
Spivack said that the Twine "knowledge networking" service really shines when used for collaboration. People can share information on a certain subject and get notifications when someone in their social network posts something new. The more information Twine gathers, the better it gets at recommendations and understanding a user's preferences.
Radar Networks' plan is to offer a free service that is advertising-supported and to introduce a line of premium services, which would be more geared toward business users.
Also in store are a set of application programming interfaces (APIs) that will let outside developers write applications on its platform. Spivack said that Radar Networks intends to follow the same strategy that Salesforce.com has in building its online development platform AppExchange, which provides a foundation for building third-party applications.
The Radar Networks platform is based on Web standards RDF and OWL (Web Ontology Language), which means that information can be transported into another service, says Spivack.
Embedded Video a fascinating video about what's happening all around us with information and how it is used, absorbed, changed, improved, collected, spread and on and on.....
It's a great take on the book Everything is Miscellaneous by David Weinberger.
Today's Web 3.0 Nonsense Blogstorm
Randy Pausch, a Carnegie Mellon University computer-science professor, was about to give a lecture Tuesday afternoon, but before he said a word, he received a standing ovation from 400 students and colleagues.
He motioned to them to sit down. "Make me earn it," he said.
They had come to see him give what was billed as his "last lecture." This is a common title for talks on college campuses today. Schools such as Stanford and the University of Alabama have mounted "Last Lecture Series," in which top professors are asked to think deeply about what matters to them and to give hypothetical final talks. For the audience, the question to be mulled is this: What wisdom would we impart to the world if we knew it was our last chance?
It can be an intriguing hour, watching healthy professors consider their demise and ruminate over subjects dear to them. At the University of Northern Iowa, instructor Penny O’Connor recently titled her lecture "Get Over Yourself." At Cornell, Ellis Hanson, who teaches a course titled "Desire," spoke about sex and technology.
At Carnegie Mellon, however, Dr. Pausch’s speech was more than just an academic exercise. The 46-year-old father of three has pancreatic cancer and expects to live for just a few months. His lecture, using images on a giant screen, turned out to be a rollicking and riveting journey through the lessons of his life.
He began by showing his CT scans, revealing 10 tumors on his liver. But after that, he talked about living. If anyone expected him to be morose, he said, "I’m sorry to disappoint you." He then dropped to the floor and did one-handed pushups.
Clicking through photos of himself as a boy, he talked about his childhood dreams: to win giant stuffed animals at carnivals, to walk in zero gravity, to design Disney rides, to write a World Book entry. By adulthood, he had achieved each goal. As proof, he had students carry out all the huge stuffed animals he’d won in his life, which he gave to audience members. After all, he doesn’t need them anymore.
He paid tribute to his techie background. "I’ve experienced a deathbed conversion," he said, smiling. "I just bought a Macintosh." Flashing his rejection letters on the screen, he talked about setbacks in his career, repeating: "Brick walls are there for a reason. They let us prove how badly we want things." He encouraged us to be patient with others. "Wait long enough, and people will surprise and impress you." After showing photos of his childhood bedroom, decorated with mathematical notations he’d drawn on the walls, he said: "If your kids want to paint their bedrooms, as a favor to me, let ’em do it."
While displaying photos of his bosses and students over the years, he said that helping others fulfill their dreams is even more fun than achieving your own. He talked of requiring his students to create videogames without sex and violence. "You’d be surprised how many 19-year-old boys run out of ideas when you take those possibilities away," he said, but they all rose to the challenge.
He also saluted his parents, who let him make his childhood bedroom his domain, even if his wall etchings hurt the home’s resale value. He knew his mom was proud of him when he got his Ph.D, he said, despite how she’d introduce him: "This is my son. He’s a doctor, but not the kind who helps people."
He then spoke about his legacy. Considered one of the nation’s foremost teachers of videogame and virtual-reality technology, he helped develop "Alice," a Carnegie Mellon software project that allows people to easily create 3-D animations. It had one million downloads in the past year, and usage is expected to soar.
"Like Moses, I get to see the Promised Land, but I don’t get to step foot in it," Dr. Pausch said. "That’s OK. I will live on in Alice."
Many people have given last speeches without realizing it. The day before he was killed, Martin Luther King Jr. spoke prophetically: "Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place." He talked of how he had seen the Promised Land, even though "I may not get there with you."
Dr. Pausch’s lecture, in the same way, became a call to his colleagues and students to go on without him and do great things. But he was also addressing those closer to his heart.
Near the end of his talk, he had a cake brought out for his wife, whose birthday was the day before. As she cried and they embraced on stage, the audience sang "Happy Birthday," many wiping away their own tears.
Dr. Pausch’s speech was taped so his children, ages 5, 2 and 1, can watch it when they’re older. His last words in his last lecture were simple: "This was for my kids." Then those of us in the audience rose for one last standing ovation.
- The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it.
- P. B. Medawar
British (Brazilian-born) anatomist (1915 - )
According to the just released Deloitte's study on Media & Entertainment practice, looking at how American consumers between 13 and 75 years of age are using media and technology today, Millennials (13-24) are leading the way, embracing new technologies, games, entertainment platforms, user-generated content and communication tools. Data from the survey show that user-generated content is in tremendous demand across the generations, with 51% of all consumers watching and/or reading content created by others
Between Web 2.0 and a Common Sense Web
By Joe Buhler, Chief Strategist, L9.com
The shelves are full of books about new and potentially revolutionary changes in the web that are transforming the global marketplace. Welcome to a new world where top down hierarchies no longer apply or are constantly being undercut and where one-way “push” marketing communication is being replaced by the “pull” of mass collaboration and peer production. Every organization must cope with these new realities in the competitive arena today and come to grips with what these changes mean to the survivability of their business.
In 1999, Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the web, envisioned this as the coming Semantic Web, when he said:
“I have a dream for the Web [in which computers] become capable of analyzing all the data on the Web – the content, links, and transactions between people and computers. A ‘Semantic Web’, which should make this possible, has yet to emerge, but when it does, the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives will be handled by machines talking to machines. The ‘intelligent agents’ people have touted for ages will finally materialize”.
As idealized, the Semantic Web, or Common Sense Web, involves the use of software agents to collect natural language information from disparate sources throughout the web and then put those elements together in various ways for people to use that information more effectively and extract greater meaning from it. In Web 2.0 we have seen both the advent and the proliferation of such agents, as web applications or widgets, as well as with specialized compilations or aggregations called “mashups”.
The actual situation on the web is a far cry from the ideal that Berners-Lee envisioned, but at this point it seems reasonable to assume we will get there sooner rather than later. The take-away messages for businesses are: (1) If you are already using the web, redouble your commitment and plan on investing more of your time and energy to make the web a central element of your business strategy going forward; (2) If you are not using the web yet or not very much at all, you really must get up on the curve as quickly as possible and make up for lost time as your business is likely at stake.
“The Long Tail” and “Wikinomics” are just two in a growing list of terms - and book titles - that try to explain and interpret what is today given the overall term - web 2.0 - where customers become “prosumers” and “crowd sourcing” or “collective intelligence” are terms thrown out along with “social networking” and “user generated content”.
What to make of it all? Tuning out is not a viable option and if you thought you were falling behind or cannot cope with these rapid developments, well there is news for you - we ain’t seen nothing yet! Nobody has really given a definite and defining label to what is already coming onto the scene. We will probably tire of the numbers game and not call this next phase web 3.0, although that is the term used in a recent New York Times article. Its title “Entrepreneurs see a web guided by common sense” is well suited. The need to make sense out of chaos is the underlying driver. Yes, wouldn’t it be great for the future web to seem like common sense -- what we the users understand and want the experience online to be? It will probably turn out that way but a lot of the process in getting there will actually be chaotic.
We certainly aren’t there yet, but it helps to understand where in terms of capabilities and development the web is today. Using the world of telecommunications as an analogy we are at a similar stage we were when the only tool available was a black rotary dial phone, which only those of us who are closer to retirement than graduation still remember being used at all.
What we will see in the next phase of the web - the next net - is that mining human intelligence will allow a layer of meaning to be built on top of the mass of collective intelligence now being gathered and spread daily. Today’s web is constantly being improved by the actions of millions of individuals who not only provide their commentary and opinions on any and all subjects but also increasingly develop their own software or “widgets” that adorn social networking sites such as MySpace or YouTube. Our interactions with the web help to actually make it better and easier to use. Many of today’s mashups interact with and combine information to provide dynamically generated applications to improve results. These self-directed tools are used for instance in vacation planning, to manage personal schedules or even entire business projects.
As the definition on Wikipedia shows, there is no consensus on how this latest iteration of the web will exactly look like but it is equally clear that further significant improvements will happen. Using the new collaboration and communications capabilities available to everyone today they will happen faster and with the involvement of the community at large, rather than in a closed development environment.
It’s been said that web 2.0 is actually what happened while we were waiting for the semantic web to appear. The more we see the emergence of these evolved tools it becomes obvious that there is a lot of truth in that statement. It is certainly not too far fetched to expect the near future to bring us completely personalized websites that are dynamically tailored to each users interest based on software tools that observe, collect, analyze and then correctly interpret the intelligence gathered from our online behavior.
I was on my way to the outhouse with some print-outs of the WSJ opinion page — the newsprint version is too harsh — when I noticed an interview between Andrew Keen, writer of The Cult of the Amateur, and David Weinberger, author of Everything is Miscellaneous.
Mr. Keen’s argument runs in the cranky old man watching Elvis on Ed Sullivan vein. He believes blogging and all this Web 2.0 razamatazz is a bunch of Commie hoo-ha and in his day you used to have to go to the library to look up the long-winded ramblings of an accredited critic, scientist, or guy-who-writes-encylopediast to get information on a topic, not some hoopty-doopty hippity hoppity kid out in Kansas with a keyboard and some moxie, by gum, whose only interests include letting dogs pee on Mr. Keen’s lawn and preventing him from getting a good night’s sleep thanks to all the Web 2.0 bordello parties they’re having down the street. Mr. Weinberger thinks Web 2.0 is cool.
Watch the sparks fly as these two UFC-certified intellectuals spar on Murdoch’s future dumping ground. Roar!
"The future is already here — it is just unevenly distributed".
When Web 2.0 came and passed, so to speak, it did so without any clear definition. But the web was changing rapidly and people apply names to things as a way to understand them. In this case it seemed to include all kinds of stuff of differing nature – meaning the web was changing in different ways simultaneously and a lot of those different things got clumped together under the misleading Web 2.0 label. There were big changes taking place in social networking – people talking to each other rather than just taking information down from web servers. On a slightly more subtle level it was also about people changing information rather than just accessing it. Web interfaces were also getting dramatically better with improved immediacy and a term we will now employ, direct empowerment. If anything, empowerment is the key to the changes that have taken place and will continue to take place.
The editors of TIME - who last year selected "YOU" as person of the year, see the dawning of a new era resulting from “the small contributions of millions of people” -- “You seizing the reigns of global media founding and framing the new digital democracy.” Powering all of this is, of course, are “consumer-generated media”, “social media” and other Web 2.0 buzz words from the debate about the changing media landscape. But TIME’s selection elevates awareness of this trend from the hot story of the day to the scale of a full-fledged social movement. TIME has recognized a momentous social development relatively early in its life-cycle as they did with “The Under-25 Generation” (1966), and “American Women” (1975). Unlike those cultural phenomena, however, “You” is not limited to a demographic segment of the country, but it is open to everyone. WebEx Connect seeks developers by ZDNet's Dan Farber --
Last year WebEx launched WebEx Connect, an on demand development platform for collaborative, composite (mashup) applications. At the Web 2.0 Expo, the company announced Connect Developer Network that includes tools, community resources and marketing programs for participants. WebEx claims that its distribution, integration and monetization platform will help to transform software "just as RSS, [...]